[Comparison] AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS vs Intel Core i7-11800H – Tiger Lake in 2023, why not?

How competitive is the Core i7-11800H in 2023? Today we’re here to answer that, as well as give another opponent to the Ryzen 7 7735HS, which has been hit & miss. While AMD is trying to promote it as a new CPU, if you dig deeper you’ll find out that it runs on the same architecture as the Ryzen 7 6800HS from last year. Compared to the Core i7-11800H, its got the same core and thread count, while the Core i7 enjoys an extra 4MB of cache, which does come in handy when gaming. While we don’t have gaming tests here, you can check out many of the laptops that come with it and how they perform, by clicking on the link below.

You can find more information about both CPUs here: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS / Intel Core i7-11800H

Specs table

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HSIntel Core i7-1280P
ArchitectureZen 3+ / Rembrandt-RTiger Lake-H45
Cores / Threads8/168/16
Clock Speeds – Base/Boost3.20 – 4.75GHz2.30 – 4.60GHz
Cache20MB24MB
Lithography6nm10nm
TDP35W45W
Memory type
DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-5200
DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267
Integrated GPUAMD Radeon 680MIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 (32EU)

CPU benchmarks

The Core i7 comes with a 2% higher 3D Rendering score, leading the charge. It’s also faster in Photoshop, finishing the benchmark 0.22 seconds sooner than the Ryzen 7.

Results are from the Cinebench R23 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)

Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)


Conclusion

The Ryzen 7 really got whopping in front of everyone, losing to the Core i7-11800H in both benchmarks. While the differences aren’t that large, the Core i7 was released all the way back in 2021, which means that you can find it for cheaper in today’s market, so if you need bang for the buck performance, this is where you should look at.

All laptops with the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS:


All laptops with the Intel Core i7-11800H:

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Faith
Faith
9 months ago

typo in benchmark for photoshop? 0.8 second faster?

Alex Iliev
9 months ago
Reply to  Faith

A sharp eye you have there, Faith! It must have been a typo indeed, and we’ve just fixed it. Thank you 🙂