[Comparison] AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 – HX 370 excels in heavy workloads, AI 9 365 is good enough for everyday tasks

LaptopMedia.com Comparații [Comparison] AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 - HX 370 excels in heavy workloads, AI 9 365 is good enough for everyday tasks

De la: Severin Kolakov 31 Iulie 2024 / 11:10 0

The new AMD Ryzen AI CPUs are so good, that now they’ve got no one else to fight but themselves. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the best AMD laptop CPU that you can get right now, thanks to its high performance and great efficiency (you can check the review of the ASUS Vivobook S 16 that uses the same CPU).

There are a lot more comparisons coming, including the Snapdragon X Elite and X Plus, as well as the Meteor Lake and the Apple M-series.

Results Source: ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606) review / (Youtube) / (Youtube)

You can find the full specs of both CPUs here: Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 / Ryzen AI 9 365

Specs table

Both CPUs use the Zen 5 and Zen 5C architecture, as the cores are split into two parts, with P-cores and E-cores (btw, the C stands for compact). The HX CPU also has two more cores and a slightly higher boost clock speed (the latter likely won’t contribute as much, if at all).

	AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Architecture	Zen 5 / Zen 5C	Zen 5 / Zen 5C
Lithography	4 nm	4 nm
Cores / Threads	12/24	10/20
Base / Max frequency	2.00 – 5.10 GHz	2.00 – 5.00 GHz
TDP	15 – 54 W	15 – 54 W
Total AI Performance	Up to 80 TOPS	Up to 73 TOPS
Cache	24 MB	24 MB
Memory type	DDR5-5600 MHz, LPDDR5x-7500 MHz	DDR5-5600 MHz, LPDDR5x-7500 MHz
Integrated graphics	AMD Radeon 890M	AMD Radeon 880M

CPU benchmarks

In terms of single-core performance, we couldn’t expect much difference since both processors use the same cores; the only distinction is that the HX 370 boosts to 5.10 GHz instead of 5.0 GHz. However, this slight increase does not confer any noticeable advantage today. Interestingly, the Ryzen AI 9 365 even holds a 1% lead, which could be considered within the margin of error.

Going to the Multi-core performance test, although Geekbench didn’t see much of a difference, Cinebench showed that the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is 12% faster. As expected, thanks to the 2 extra cores / 4 threads that 370 HX carries.

Responsiveness (Single-Core)

Performanța single-core asigură o funcționare fluidă și reactivitate în sistemele de operare, oferind o experiență de utilizare mai bună.

Rezultatele sunt de la testul Geekbench 6 Single-Core (un scor mai mare este mai bun)

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ASUS Zenbook S 16

Verifică prețul

2817

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ASUS Zenbook S 16

Verifică prețul

2854

Heavy Work (Multi-Core)

Performanța multi-core este esențială pentru gestionarea sarcinilor complexe și solicitante, cum ar fi editarea video, CAD și simulările științifice.

Rezultatele sunt de la testul Geekbench 6 Multi-Core (un scor mai mare este mai bun)

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ASUS Zenbook S 16

Verifică prețul

13363

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ASUS Zenbook S 16

Verifică prețul

13162

3D Rendering

Aici, evaluăm performanța procesorului folosind o sarcină de randare 3D reală, analizând capacitatea sa de a gestiona eficient calcule complexe și sarcini de randare.

Rezultatele sunt de la testul Cinebench 2024 Multi-Core (un scor mai mare este mai bun)

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ASUS Zenbook S 16

Verifică prețul

976

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ASUS Zenbook S 16

Verifică prețul

872

GPU benchmarks

In the 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark, the Radeon 890M shows to have a significant edge in terms of graphics performance over the Radeon 880M, with a 15% higher score.