[Comparison] Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs Intel Core i5-1135G7 – an expected win for the Core i5
Once again we are covering Tiger Lake, this time focusing on the entry-level offering, in the face of the newly available Core i3-1115G4, which is quite the little performer, considering the price you’re paying.
No, it won’t crush benchmarks or surprise you with a record-breaking level of performance, but it is more than capable to handle daily tasks and dabble quickly in some photo editing or anything creative.
Today we are comparing it against its bigger brother, the Core i5-1135G7, to see how big is the performance gap, both in CPU and GPU performance.
Here is our Top Laptop CPU Ranking, where you can find the most powerful laptop processors.
You can find out more about both CPUs here: Intel Core i3-1115G4 / Intel Core i5-1135G7
Specs table
| Intel Core i3-1115G4 | Intel Core i5-1135G7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Cores / Threads | 2/4 | 4/8 |
| Base / Max frequency | 3.00 – 4.10GHz | 2.40 – 4.20GHz |
| Cache | 6MB | 8MB |
| TDP / up / down | 12W / 15W / 28W | 12W / 15W / 28W |
| Memory support | DDR4-3200MHz, LPDDR4x-3733MHz | DDR4-3200MHz, LPDDR4x-4266MHz |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) |
CPU benchmarks
To begin with the CPU results, in the 3D Rendering test, the Core i5-1135G7 was the better CPU, managing to score 49% higher than its little brother. In Photoshop, results were similar, with the Core i5 completing the test with a lead of more than three seconds.
結果はCinebench 20 CPUテストのものです(スコアが高いほど良い)
GPU benchmark
Continuing on with the GPU tests, across all of them, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 performed better. To go into detail, the iGPU was 47%, 35%, and 65% better in 3D Mark Fire Strike, Unigine Heaven 4.0, and Unigine Superposition respectively. Respectively, the difference in real-life gaming goes from 10% to 47%, depending on the game and the graphics settings.
結果は3DMark Time Spy (Graphics)のものです。数値が高いほど良い。
結果は3DMark Fire Strike (Graphics)ベンチマークのものです(スコアが高いほど良い)
結果はUnigine Superpositionベンチマークのものです(スコアが高いほど良い)
Gaming tests

| CS:GO | HD 1080p, Low (Check settings) | HD 1080p, Medium (Check settings) | HD 1080p, MAX (Check settings) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | 75 fps | 52 fps | 24 fps |
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) | 93 fps (+24% ) | 71 fps (+37% ) | 35 fps (+46% ) |

| DOTA 2 | HD 1080p, Low (Check settings) | HD 1080p, Normal (Check settings) | HD 1080p, High (Check settings) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | 76 fps | 50 fps | 27 fps |
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) | 91 fps (+20% ) | 55 fps (+10% ) | 35 fps (+30% ) |
Conclusion
To conclude the results from above, when it comes to benchmarks, both CPU and GPU, the Core i5-1135G7 was undoubtedly the better CPU. Even in gaming (of course, AAA titles are pretty much out of the question), the integrated graphics inside the Core i5 has the edge as well. So if you want to dabble in more creative work or design, the i5 will suit you better, but if you’re just going to be using the device for browsing and multimedia, the i3 will still get the job more than well done.










![[2026年6月] Amazonグローバルにおけるノートパソコンのベストセラーブランド ― 販売台数と売上高の両面で、Appleが圧倒的な優位性を示す](https://laptopmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/GLOBAL-Best-Brands-400x225.jpg)
![[2026年6月] アマゾン・グローバル:ノートパソコン売上ランキングトップ10――Appleの新型「MacBook Neo」が1位に躍り出て、手頃な価格帯で市場を再編](https://laptopmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Best-Selling-Laptops-GLOBAL-Top-10-400x225.jpg)
![[2026年6月] アマゾン・グローバル:ゲーム用ノートPC売上ランキングトップ10――エイサーの「Nitro V 16S AI」が販売台数で首位を独占、ASUSが総売上高で首位に立つ](https://laptopmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Best-Selling-Gaming-Laptops-GLOBAL-Top-10-400x225.jpg)
![[2026年6月] AmazonにおけるノートPC用GPUの世界販売ランキング ― NVIDIA RTX 5060が専用GPU部門で首位を獲得](https://laptopmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Best-Selling-GPUs-GLOBAL-Top-10-400x225.jpg)
![[2026年6月] AmazonにおけるノートPC用CPUの世界販売ランキング ― Apple M5が首位を独占、AMD Ryzen 7 260がプレミアム層で堅調なシェアを獲得](https://laptopmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Best-Selling-CPUs-GLOBAL-Top-10-400x225.jpg)
