United Kingdom
India
Deutschland
France
Canada
España
Belgium
Netherlands
Poland
Sweden
България
Australia
Singapore
Italia
中国
日本[FPS Benchmarks] DOOM (2016) on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (40W and 50W) – very close results on Medium and Ultra details
DOOM (2016) may be not the newest game in our benchmark list but this title is still a good one. The graphics are okay even for 2020 (at least for us), the gameplay is super-fast and breath-taking. And the soundtrack is inspiring and it contributes to the brutal atmosphere while killing a countless number of monsters.
Speaking of monster, this title isn’t too heavy for today’s hardware. Based on our previous tests, a low-end GPU like the GeForce MX350 can deliver almost 60 FPS on Low settings. So, let’s see what the mid-rangers are able to do when the gun of the Doom Slayer is displayed on your screen.
As always, the tested GPUs are the GeForce GTX 1650 [40W, 896 CUDA, GDDR6] and the GeForce GTX 1650 [50W, 1024 CUDA, GDDR5].
Contents
GeForce GTX 1650 variants
| GeForce GTX 1650 [40W] | GeForce GTX 1650 [50W] | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| GPU chip | TU117 | TU117 |
| Shader units | 896 – 1024 | 896 – 1024 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| Base Clock (MHz) | up to 1395 | up to 1395 |
| Boost clock (MHz) | up to 1560 | up to 1560 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | up to 8000 | up to 8000 |
| Memory size (MB) | 4GB | up to 4GB |
| Memory type | GDDR5 / GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus width (bit) | 128 | 128 |
| TGP (Total Graphics Power) | 40W | 50W (+25%) |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Technology | 12nm | 14nm |
| RTX capabilities | No | No |
| Release date | 01.2020 | 04.2019 |
| Detailed specs | Link | Link |
Synthetic benchmarks
Gaming tests and gameplay videos (ext. monitor)
| Doom (2016) | Full HD, Low (Check settings) | Full HD, Medium (Check settings) | Full HD, Ultra (Check settings) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1650 [40W] | 121 fps | 103 fps (+6%) | 98 fps (+1%) |
| GeForce GTX 1650 [50W] | 149 fps (+23%) | 97 fps | 97 fps |
Verdict
That was a bit unexpected – on Low details the GeForce GTX 1650 [50W] is 23% faster which seems normal. However, on Medium and Ultra settings, the GeForce GTX 1650 [40W] has the upper hand with a minimal lead. The difference is so small that hardly anyone is going to notice it.
Still, the GeForce GTX 1650 [50W] is good-enough for 144Hz panels if you don’t mind low details. On Medium and Ultra, both GPUs are close to 100 FPS.
All laptops equipped with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 [40W]
All laptops equipped with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 [50W]
