United States
United Kingdom
India
France
Canada
España
Belgium
Netherlands
Poland
Sweden
България
Australia
Singapore
Italia
中国
日本[Comparison] Intel Core i7-1165G7 vs i7-1065G7 – the new one is a potential game-changer
Even though Intel has recently been on the losing side in the CPU world they still continue to reinvent their CPUs and present new innovations. In this comparison, we have last year’s Intel Core i7-1065G7 versus this year’s contender – the Intel Core i7-1165G7. The latter is based on the new Tiger Lake architecture and it has the potential to be even better than previous power-efficient Intel CPUs. These new processors promise better battery life for mobile platforms and better performance.
Mobile CPUs are a popular option for a lot of consumers and this is why we decided to see how they compare against one another. This comparison is a work-in-progress and it will be updated when we have more tests for the new Tiger Lake-based processors.
More detailed specs here: Intel Core i7-1065G7 / Intel Core i7-1165G7
Specs
There are two notable changes in the Core i7-1165G7 when compared to the Core i7-1065G7. Firstly, the new one has a slightly higher base and boost frequencies, starting at 2.80GHz and maxing out at 4.40 GHz, and secondly, it is equipped with 4MB more cache than its predecessor. These two changes suggest that the Core i7-1165G7 should perform better than the older version.
| Intel Core i7-1165G7 | Intel Core i7-1065G67 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Base / Max frequency | 2.80 – 4.40 GHz | 1.30 – 3.90 GHz |
| Cache | 12 MB Cache | 8 MB Cache |
| TDP / up / down | 15W / 28W / 10W | 15W / 25W / 10W |
| Memory support | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 |
CPU Benchmarks
In the Cinebench 15 3D rendering test the i7-1165G7 performed 30% better than the i7-1065G7. When it came to Adobe Photoshop the newer Tiger Lake Chip was better as well, being 1.2 seconds faster.
Die Ergebnisse stammen aus dem Cinebench 20 CPU-Test (je höher die Punktzahl, desto besser)
Die Ergebnisse stammen aus unserem Photoshop-Benchmark-Test (je niedriger die Punktzahl, desto besser)
GPU Benchmarks
In terms of GPU performance, the new Iris Xe Graphics G7 is superior throughout all of our tests registering performance gains that range from 88% to up to 133%.
Die Ergebnisse stammen aus dem 3DMark: Time Spy (Graphics) Benchmark (je höher die Punktzahl, desto besser)
Die Ergebnisse stammen aus dem 3DMark: Fire Strike (Grafik) Benchmark (je höher die Punktzahl, desto besser)
Die Ergebnisse stammen aus dem Unigine Superposition Benchmark (je höher die Punktzahl, desto besser)
Gaming tests
And here you can see some real-life results from some of our favorite games.
| CS:GO | HD 1080p, Low (Check settings) | HD 1080p, Medium (Check settings) | HD 1080p, MAX (Check settings) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 | 168 fps (+112%) | 120 fps (+126%) | 70 fps (+112%) |
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 | 79 fps | 53 fps | 33 fps |
| DOTA 2 | HD 1080p, Low (Check settings) | HD 1080p, Normal (Check settings) | HD 1080p, High (Check settings) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 | 123 fps (+31%) | 87 fps (+89%) | 60 fps (+107%) |
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 | 94 fps | 46 fps | 29 fps |
Conclusion
Both our CPU and GPU tests show that the new Tiger Lake i7-1165G7 is better than its last-gen counterpart. In terms of CPU performance, the new Tiger Lake chip performed 23% better in Cinebench 15 and was 1.2 seconds faster in Photoshop. And in our GPU tests, the newer Iris Xe Graphics G7 was up to 133% better than the Iris Plus Graphics G7.
was-on 4500u level
now-on 4700u level
Please come back to notebookcheck!
The comments section over there misses you.