Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 (Intel) review – Great Display, Quiet Workhorse


    Temperatures and comfort, Battery Life

    Max CPU load

    In this test we use 100% on the CPU cores, monitoring their frequencies and chip temperature. The first column shows a computer’s reaction to a short load (2-10 seconds), the second column simulates a serious task (between 15 and 30 seconds), and the third column is a good indicator of how good the laptop is for long loads such as video rendering.

    Average P-core frequency; Average E-core frequency; CPU temp.; Package Power

    Intel Core i5-1335U (15W TDP)0:02 – 0:10 sec0:15 – 0:30 sec10:00 – 15:00 min
    Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 23.77 GHz @ 2.92 GHz @ 74°C @ 49W3.64 GHz @ 2.86 GHz @ 88°C @ 48W2.13 GHz @ 1.66 GHz @ 69°C @ 21W
    HP 470 G102.14 GHz @ 1.62 GHz @ 55°C @ 19W1.87 GHz @ 1.51 GHz @ 59°C @ 16W1.91 GHz @ 1.57 GHz @ 69°C @ 17W
    Acer Aspire Vero 15 (AV15-53P)3.45 GHz @ 2.55 GHz @ 65°C @ 45W3.08 GHz @ 2.33 GHz @ 67°C @ 38W2.50 GHz @ 1.94 GHz @ 59°C @ 28W
    Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen 4 (Intel)3.24 GHz @ 2.34 GHz @ 79°C @ 33W3.12 GHz @ 2.29 GHz @ 89°C @ 32W1.72 GHz @ 1.39 GHz @ 65°C @ 15W
    HP EliteBook 640 G103.78 GHz @ 2.88 GHz @ 83°C @ 50W2.75 GHz @ 1.96 GHz @ 77°C @ 26W2.35 GHz @ 1.77 GHz @ 76°C @ 23W
    Acer TravelMate P4 (TMP413-51)3.52 GHz @ 2.67 GHz @ 77°C @ 44W3.27 GHz @ 2.45 GHz @ 82°C @ 41W2.16 GHz @ 1.67 GHz @ 64°C @ 22W
    HP EliteBook 650 G103.73 GHz @ 2.87 GHz @ 88°C @ 49W2.81 GHz @ 2.09 GHz @ 90°C @ 29W2.50 GHz @ 1.88 GHz @ 81°C @ 24W
    HP 250 G103.33 GHz @ 2.46 GHz @ 73°C @ 40W3.08 GHz @ 2.23 GHz @ 85°C @ 35W2.11 GHz @ 1.76 GHz @ 76°C @ 22W
    ASUS Vivobook 17 F1704 (X1704)3.10 GHz @ 2.14 GHz @ 71°C @ 30W3.09 GHz @ 2.16 GHz @ 89°C @ 30W1.97 GHz @ 1.67 GHz @ 70°C @ 18W
    ASUS Vivobook 15 F1504 (X1504)2.99 GHz @ 2.07 GHz @ 66°C @ 28W2.94 GHz @ 2.07 GHz @ 81°C @ 28W2.02 GHz @ 1.68 GHz @ 75°C @ 18W
    Acer Aspire 5 (A515-58M)2.05 GHz @ 2.74 GHz @ 61°C @ 47W1.81 GHz @ 2.54 GHz @ 64°C @ 40W1.22 GHz @ 2.23 GHz @ 61°C @ 28W
    HP ProBook 440 G102.39 GHz @ 2.93 GHz @ 93°C @ 50W1.51 GHz @ 2.29 GHz @ 92°C @ 30W0.94 GHz @ 1.87 GHz @ 72°C @ 19W
    HP ProBook 450 G103.41 GHz @ 2.79 GHz @ 94°C @ 48W2.80 GHz @ 2.17 GHz @ 94°C @ 31W1.87 GHz @ 2.04 GHz @ 81°C @ 23W
    Acer Swift Go 16 (SFG16-71)3.29 GHz @ 2.46 GHz @ 65°C @ 45W3.06 GHz @ 2.37 GHz @ 71°C @ 42W1.80 GHz @ 1.98 GHz @ 61°C @ 28W
    Lenovo ThinkBook 14s Yoga Gen 31.91 GHz @ 1.20 GHz @ 63°C @ 19W1.86 GHz @ 0.90 GHz @ 74°C @ 14W1.83 GHz @ 0.90 GHz @ 60°C @ 13W

    The Core i5-1335U can maintain impressively high clocks and power limits in short and medium loads. In long stress, the frequencies are still good and the temperatures are in check.

    Comfort during full load

    The power presets are integrated into the default Windows performance modes which is very convenient. The single fan is quiet even when the CPU has to do the heavy lifting for a long time. At the same time, the keyboard doesn’t feel too hot to the touch so you can use it comfortably for work.

    In idle, the fan rotating speed is ~1900 RPM and ~ 2500 RPM in max processor loads. The fan should be a quality one since it remains quiet under any kind of stress.

    Battery

    Now, we conduct the battery tests with Windows Better performance setting turned on, screen brightness adjusted to 120 nits and all other programs turned off except for the one we are testing the notebook with. The 52.5Wh battery lasts for 20 hours of Web browsing or 9 hours and 5 minutes of video playback. That’s a very good result! To achieve that, you have to apply the “Balanced” preset in the Windows “Power & Battery” menu and set the “Scheme for Battery” to “Balanced” mode in the BIOS.

    In order to simulate real-life conditions, we used our own script for automatic web browsing through over 70 websites.



    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest
    1 Comment
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Nuky
    Nuky
    2 years ago

    I have similar T16 Gen 2, only with i7-1355U and 1920 x 1200, 300 nits, 45% NTSC display. My display is good for office work but not great for someone who would use laptop for multimedia. Display in reviewed unit must be much better for that. If i could change something i would go for bigger 86 Wh battery because this 52.5 Wh doesn’t go much further than 4 hours for me while browsing and using MS Office when display is near that 300 nits. Speakers are also considerably worse than on my P1 Gen 6.