[FPS Benchmarks] For Honor on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (165W) and RTX 3070 (140W) – the bigger GPU is 14% faster

    For Honor is still alive and kicking no matter the fact that it’s a 2017 game. It looks okay even for 2021 standards, the gameplay is fun and somehow still unique, and overall, the game isn’t too heavy even on Extreme details.

    Still, if you have a 144 Hz display or even better, most of the mid-range GPUs aren’t enough. So, without further ado, let’s see how fast the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (165W) and RTX 3070 (140W) are when it comes to For Honor.

    Don’t forget to take a look at our Top 100 Best Laptops for For Honor list.

    Contents


    GeForce RTX 3080 and RTX 3070 variants

     GeForce RTX 3080 [165W]GeForce RTX 3070 [140W]
    ArchitectureAmpereAmpere
    GPU chipGA104GA104
    Shader units6144 (+20%)5120
    ROPs9696
    Base Clock (MHz)1350 (+22%)1110
    Boost clock (MHz)up to 1710 (+10%)1560
    Memory clock (MHz)17501750
    Memory size (MB)81928192
    Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
    Memory bus width (bit)256256
    TGP (Total Graphics Power)165W (+18%)140W
    DirectX version12.212.2
    Technology8nm8nm
    RTX capabilitiesYes Yes
    Release date01.202101.2021
    Detailed specsLinkLink

     

    Synthetic benchmarks


    Gaming tests and gameplay videos (ext. monitor)

    For HonorFull HD, Medium (Check settings)Full HD, High (Check settings)Full HD, Extreme (Check settings)
    GeForce RTX 3080 [165W]267 fps (+15%)256 fps (+15%)205 fps (+13%)
    GeForce RTX 3070 [140W]232 fps223 fps181 fps





    Verdict

    The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (165W) is 14% faster on average which is fine but considering the high price of the RTX 3080 (165W)-based laptops, the GeForce RTX 3070 (140W) looks like the smart choice in this comparison. It offers plenty of performance and it’ll save you a lot of money as well.

    All laptops equipped with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 [165W]

    All laptops equipped with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 [140W]

    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest
    0 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments